The Minnesota Supreme Court unanimously upheld Al Franken’s election in last November’s U.S. Senate race. After eight months of what, in all fairness, were probably lawsuits that any candidate would have pursued, Norm Coleman can finally throw in the towel and return to…probably not Minnesota.
Anybody who’s ever bothered to listen to Coleman will probably find it strange that a Minnesota senator would have a thick Brooklyn accent. Indeed, Coleman was a carpetbagger, and in more ways than one. He is also the former Democratic mayor of St. Paul, who conveniently decided to become a Republican in 1996.
Coleman was about as bad as any Republican is expected to be. He was a lackey for the Bush administration from the moment the former president convinced him to run against then-Sen. Paul Wellstone. He only defected from the administration’s Iraq policy in 2007, when Bush’s approval ratings had hit rock-bottom and he was gearing up for a re-election battle. He supported Bush on stem-cell research, gay marriage, and even switched his position on the ANWR to appease party leadership. Perhaps most comical was his statement on marijuana, for which he was an advocate as a college student:
“The health problems that may occur from this highly addictive drug include short-term memory loss, anxiety, respiratory illness and a risk of lung cancer that far exceeds that of tobacco products.” Interestingly, no study has ever determined the last allegation, in fact, quite the opposite has been suggested by medical experts.
It was fitting that Coleman won election after the popular liberal icon died in a plane crash – it was simply the tip of the iceberg of a career defined by opportunism. Is Al Franken the most qualified Minnesotan to occupy that senate seat? Probably not, although Ben Stein seems to think so. However, Franken will nevertheless be a welcome change to the years of endless political calculation by Coleman.
Nevertheless, the media is overblowing the importance of the “60 seats” the Democrats now have after Arlen Specter’s defection and Franken’s election. There is no such thing as a filibuster-proof majority unless a party leader can rest assured that he has 60 votes on ANY given issue. This is certainly not the case if you look at the Senate caucus. As expected, there are a variety of competing domestic interests. They affect tax policy, agriculture, energy, the environment etc. Then there are Democrats who are simply too conservative – they come from conservative areas and feel politically obligated to defect from the party line on certain issues, especially relating to social policy – gun control, gay rights, etc. Ben Nelson, a Democrat from Nebraska, for instance, is easily more conservative than several Republicans (although the number of moderate Republicans is down to about two now).
Although there are a lot of votes that are practically party-line, the vast majority will include a few defections from each side.